BUY OR SELL-Is Monster really worth $3 billion?

By Nick Zieminski

NEW YORK, Nov 29 (BestGrowthStock) – It has been a monstrous stock

Shares of online job board Monster Worldwide Inc (MWW.N: ),
which sold for $10.01 in August, have more than doubled since
then, as Wall Street reassesses earnings prospects after its
purchase of rival from Yahoo (YHOO.O: ) and a
stronger-than-expected quarterly earnings report.

Despite a pull-back on Monday from a two-year high, the
shares are now above $22. The stock has far outperformed both
its Internet and staffing industry peers.

Whether fundamentals justify a valuation of nearly $3
billion is on open question.

Monster gets plaudits for aggressively bringing down costs
during the downturn, improving its job search technology, and
expanding in fast-growing markets like China. It is also
credited for paying a good price for the site.

It also benefits from the shift of classified advertising
from newspapers and an instantly recognizable brand name, its
familiarity bought with years of expensive Super Bowl ads.

But it is still a highly cyclical company in an environment
of modest economic growth and tepid job gains, in a competitive
landscape of fast-changing technology.

Among analysts who follow the stock, seven rate Monster
“buy” or “outperform,” five rate it “hold” and three rate it
“sell or “underperform,” according to Reuters data.


“You’ve had a reevaluation of Monster,” said Citi
Investment Research analyst Mark Mahaney, who upgraded Monster
to “buy” after October’s earnings surprise. “It’s the first
time in years you’ve had year-over-year growth in revenue,
bookings and deferred revenue. That tells you something.”

Bookings, a leading indicator of future sales, were up 26
percent in the third quarter. Monster, which operates job
boards in 56 countries, said it expects at least 20 percent
sales growth next year. [ID:nN29212312]

Monster has improved its sales process, listings and search
capability; it is riding a cyclical recovery; and its cost
structure has improved, said Mahaney. Annual operating costs
are down by a fifth since 2007, and Monster has said costs will
rebound only slightly next year.

“They’re going to start seeing revenue growth again,”
Mahaney said. “All of that will flow to the bottom line.”

A fourth tailwind has yet to be proven: whether Monster can
gain market share against or specialists like (DHX.N: ), which posts finance and technology jobs.

“That, to me, is the biggest swing factor here,” he said.
“If there is a materially improved competitive position, the
stock can go materially higher. If there isn’t, it can go
modestly higher.”

Citi could revisit its buy recommendation if the stock
rallied much beyond its $22 price target or if the U.S. economy
suffers a double-dip recession, which is unlikely, Mahaney
said. The recommendation could also change amid “clear signs of
client losses and market share losses to the LinkedIns, the
Dices, the CareerBuilders of the world,” he said.


Earnings expectations have jumped. Analysts, on average,
expect Monster to earn 41 cents a share in 2011, up from the 30
cents they expected a month ago, before its earnings report.

But some question investors’ newfound bullishness.

UBS analyst John Janedis maintained his “sell” rating on
Monster shares last week, saying growth in job postings was
slowing compared to their pace earlier in the year. UBS’s price
target on the stock is $12.

Morningstar’s Larry Witt estimates Monster’s fair value at
$15, about a third below where it is now. Monster’s tailwinds,
or benefits, are balanced out by headwinds like competition
from specialized job searches or newer rivals like Facebook.

The stock rally “has gone a little too far, unless people
are expecting some massive recovery in jobs,” he said. “The
company did not dramatically change within the last couple of
months. The stock price appears a little rich here.”

U.S. October jobs growth was stronger than expected. But
current forecasts for the November jobs report call for job
growth slightly below October’s pace [ECI/US].

Witt said it is hard to value Monster against peers since
its closest competitor, CareerBuilder, is not public. Monster
is going to be profitable in 2011, he said, but based on those
estimated earnings, the stock appears expensive compared other
Internet names.

“People suddenly woke up and realized that the fundamentals
are going to do well over the next couple of years. They want
to get ahead of it and they’re not worried about long-term
valuations,” Witt said.
(Reporting by Nick Zieminski; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

BUY OR SELL-Is Monster really worth $3 billion?