Disappointed gays unlikely to shun U.S. Democrats

* Obama falls short on ending ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’

* Groups urge gay voters to withhold money from Democrats

* Donations might be more important than votes

By Nichola Groom

WEST HOLLYWOOD, Calif., Oct 30 (BestGrowthStock) – Gay voters,
disappointed with U.S. President Barack Obama’s failure to do
away with a ban on gays in the military, have pared back
funding for Democrats in the midterm elections but are unlikely
to abandon them at the polls on Tuesday.

One of the most vocal and affluent groups of the Democratic
base, gay voters say they have received nothing in return for
decades of loyalty to the party, even after two years of
Democratic leadership in both the White House and Congress.

“We voted for Democrats. We gave them the House and the
Senate, and what did we get?” said John Aravosis, editor of the
left-leaning blog AMERICAblog.

Disillusionment in the gay community with both Obama and
his party is palpable. Obama, who received strong support from
gays in his 2008 election, says he supports ending the ban on
gays openly serving in the military. But his administration is
now challenging attempts by a federal judge to impose an end to
the ban, saying it is up to Congress, not the courts.
<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Top News-U.S. elections http://link.reuters.com/fyq86p

TAKE A LOOK on elections [ID:nUSVOTE]

For an election pdf, see http://link.reuters.com/faq52q

For U.S. elections web page:

http://www.reuters.com/politics/elections-2010
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

In addition to scrapping the “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” ban,
gay voters had hoped Democrats would use their power to pass a
law that would make it illegal to discriminate against
employees on the basis of sexual orientation and to repeal a
1996 law that defines marriage as between a man and a woman.

With none of those goals accomplished, gay rights group
GetEQUAL last month began urging gays to withhold donations to
the Democratic National Committee and other party groups.
AMERICAblog has a similar initiative.

Those activists hope to send a message to Democrats who
depend on gay voters’ wallets even more than their votes.

“At the national level, there are just not enough gays and
lesbians to be politically powerful” except in very close
races, Stanford University Professor Gary Segura said.

“The role that gays and lesbians have played is more of a
financial one,” he added.

Polls show public discontent with Obama and the ailing U.S.
economy is likely to help Republicans win back control of the
House of Representatives and cut into Democrats’ Senate
majority in Tuesday’s elections.

RESENTMENT OVER ‘GAY ATM’

Donations to federal candidates from gay interest groups
have taken a hit this year, according to the Center for
Responsive Politics. Gay groups have donated $849,410 to
federal candidates during the 2010 election cycle, down from
$1.8 million in 2008 and $2 million in 2006.

Despite that decline, however, gay Democratic groups said
gay voters are engaged and mobilized this year.

This week, for instance, Stonewall Democratic Club in Los
Angeles said that with just 24 hours notice, it attracted 90
volunteers to a Wednesday afternoon phone bank for incumbent
Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer.

“There has been some despondency, but folks have really
come around,” Stonewall president John Cleary said.

As for the drop in donations, it is the economy, rather
than voter disappointment, that is mostly to blame, said Andy
Szekeres, a political consultant who specializes in gay rights
ballot measures. Nevertheless, he said, political donors in the
gay community feel they have been treated like a “gay ATM” by
the Democratic party.

Many gay activists worry that telling gays to stop donating
to Democrats is akin to asking them to sit out the election.

“The message that people deliver when they say that we
shouldn’t contribute to Democrats in particular is a little bit
dangerous,” said Rick Jacobs, founder of community organizing
group the Courage Campaign.

“There is no way” that a Congress dominated by Republicans
will be better for gays than a Democratic-led one, he said.

At a coffee shop in the gay-friendly city of West
Hollywood, attorney Ricardo Gomez, 55, echoed that sentiment,
saying he voted absentee for Boxer, whom he does not care for,
because he thinks her rival, Republican Carly Fiorina, would be
worse on gay issues.

“I’m a pragmatic voter,” Gomez said. “I hold my nose, but I
always vote.”
(Editing by Mary Milliken and Mohammad Zargham)

Disappointed gays unlikely to shun U.S. Democrats