FEATURE-Privacy chiefs keep watch over Facebook, social media

* Data protection at forefront of concerns

* Facebook, other sites under pressure to change settings

* Debate raises possibility of legislative moves

By Sangeeta Shastry

BRUSSELS, April 22 (Reuters Life!) – Over the past six
years, social networking has been the Internet’s stand-out
phenomenon, linking up more than one billion people eager to
exchange videos, pictures or last-minute birthday wishes.

The sites, led by Facebook with more than 400 million users,
rely in large part on people’s willingness to share a wealth of
personal information with an ever-expanding network of
“friends”, either ones they actually know and see from time to
time, or those they have met virtually through the Internet.

Members’ eagerness to add contacts has given the sites a
powerful global reach, attracting users from 7 to 70 years old,
from skateboarders to investment bankers, and with them a deep
and potentially rich vein of targeted advertising revenue.

But at the same time it has concentrated vast amounts of
data — telephone numbers and addresses, people’s simple likes
and dislikes — on the servers of a small number of companies.

In Facebook’s case, the social networking tsunami has spread
in barely six years from the Harvard dormroom of founder Mark
Zuckerberg, 25, to envelope almost half a billion people —
enough to be the world’s third most populous country.

That in turn has raised profound privacy issues, with
governments in Europe and North America and Asia concerned about
the potential for data theft, for people’s identities to be
mined for income or children to be exploited via the Internet.

Data protection authorities from a range of countries held a
teleconference this week to discuss how they can work together
to protect what they see as a steady erosion of privacy, and the
European Union too is studying what role it can play.

They may not be able to hold the social networking wave
back, but policymakers are looking at what they can do to limit
what they see as the “Big Brother”-like role of some sites. A
showdown between privacy and Internet freedom is looming.

“We cannot expect citizens to trust Europe if we are not
serious in defending the right to privacy,” Viviane Reding, the
European commissioner in charge of media and the information
society, said in a speech in January, laying out her concerns.

“Facebook, MySpace or Twitter have become extremely popular,
particularly among young people,” she told the European
Parliament. “However, children are not always able to assess all
risks associated with exposing personal data.”


The privacy debate has been around as long as the Internet,
but the explosive growth of social networking, and deepening
concern about the impact it may be having on social interaction,
has intensified discussion in recent months.

Incidents such as the Israeli soldier who announced details
of an upcoming military raid via Facebook, and the murder
conviction in Britain of a serial rapist who posed as a boy on
the site, have fuelled the fears of both lawmakers and parents.

In 2009 and again this year, Canadian authorities challenged
Facebook’s default privacy settings and its use of personal
information for targeted advertising. Norway filed complaints
after a year-long study of the site’s terms and conditions.

Facebook has added fuel to the debate, with the company
deciding in December 2009 to substantially change its privacy
settings, effectively making members’ profiles more openly
accessible unless users altered the settings themselves.

Zuckerberg explained the move in January, saying social
behaviour was shifting as a result of the Internet and that
privacy was not the same now as it was even six years ago.

“People have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more
information and different kinds, but more openly and with more
people,” he told an audience at a technology conference.

“That social norm is just something that has evolved. We
view it as our role in the system to constantly be innovating
and be updating what our system is to reflect what the current
social norms are,” he said.

That may well be the case — and the trend for teenagers to
share naked or near-naked pictures of one another online or via
mobile phones may suggest mores are changing — but privacy
campaigners believe the slope is getting too slippery.

Thomas Nortvedt, the head of digitial issues at the
Norwegian Consumer Council, a government body, sees Facebook’s
alteration of its privacy settings as a turning point.

“The privacy settings on Facebook have raised awareness on
… privacy as a whole, not only by the people but also by the
governments and the regulating authorities,” he told Reuters.

“They see that this is, if not a problem, then at least a
challenge and something has to be done about it.”

As Canada’s privacy commissioner, Jennifer Stoddart, told
data protection experts on Tuesday: “We want to send a strong
message that you can’t go on using people’s personal information
without their consent… Do your testing before, and make sure
they comply with privacy legislation.”


With government authorities raising their concerns ever more
loudly, Facebook and other sites have amended some of their
practices, or highlighted the range of measures they say they
are already taking to protect members’ privacy and data.

As a result of the Canadian Privacy Commission’s
investigation, Facebook agreed to adopt some recommendations,
including explaining why users have to provide their date of
birth at registration and introducing ‘high’, ‘medium’ and ‘low’
privacy settings for user-published content.

But other recommendations — such as limiting the ability of
third-party applications to pull non-essential user information
— were not immediately applied. Though the Commission was
satisfied with Facebook’s further proposed privacy changes as
of last August, a new investigation began this January in light
of the site’s amendments to its privacy policy.

The European Commission, the executive arm of the European
Union and its 500 million citizens, does not regulate on privacy
issues, leaving it up to the EU’s 27 member states, but it can
issue guidelines or directives for corporate practices.

In February, the Commission unveiled its “Safer Social
Networking Principles for the EU”, a voluntary pact involving
25 websites that agreed to safety measures for users under 18,
including making profiles private and unsearchable by default.

But the agreement was drawn up before Facebook announced the
changes to its privacy settings, a move that frustrated the EU.

“I can’t understand that,” Commissioner Reding said on the
EU’s Safer Internet Day in February. “It’s in the interests of
social network sites to give users control of their privacy.”

In the coming months, Reding and her team are expected to
study the activities of sites such as Facebook and Google, which
recently launched its own social network, and pay close
attention to any perceived privacy slippages.

Authorities in Canada, Spain, Germany, Britain and the
Netherlands are watching closely too.

Officials want to emphasise to users, particularly young and
vulnerable ones, that too much sensitive information can easily
be posted to sites, and can then be mined by advertisers and
third parties through applications like games or quizzes.

No one wants to be seen be legislating against the freedom
and fun of the Internet. But watchdogs also see privacy as an
cornerstone of democratic societies that also needs defending.

“What we’re going to do in the coming months and years is
organise ourselves as enforcement agencies in an international
way,” Jacob Kohnstamm, the chairman of the Dutch Data Protection
Authority, told privacy protection chiefs this week.

“So that the gap between the online market being global and
the enforcement being national is going to be filled up by
actions like we start today.”
Stock Market Research

(Editing by Luke Baker and Paul Casciato)

FEATURE-Privacy chiefs keep watch over Facebook, social media